Documenting Platform Failures: Building a Case for Ofcom
How parents, schools, and professionals can document when platforms fail to act on child safety reports — building intelligence useful to Ofcom and, in serious cases, to the police.
When a platform fails to respond adequately to a report about child safety, individual frustration rarely leads to change on its own. But well-documented, persistent evidence of platform failures — collected by multiple individuals and organisations — is exactly the kind of intelligence that informs Ofcom's enforcement decisions. This guide explains how to document platform failures effectively, whether you are a parent, a school safeguarding lead, or a professional working with children.
Why documentation matters
Ofcom's enforcement powers are strongest when it can show systemic failure — a pattern of behaviour by a platform, not just an isolated incident. Individual complaints are valuable but are most powerful when they form part of a documented pattern. Well-documented failures also support the police and Crown Prosecution Service if the matter escalates to criminal proceedings. Good documentation is not about building a legal case yourself — it is about creating a clear, credible factual record that others can use.
Key takeaway: Documented patterns of failure carry far more regulatory weight than individual complaints made in isolation.
What to record at each stage
At each stage of a complaint process, record: the date and time of the report or action; the platform name; the specific content reported (description and URL or screenshot); the report reference number provided by the platform (if any); the platform's response — including the exact wording — and the date received; any follow-up you made and the response. A simple spreadsheet or document folder with dated screenshots and correspondence is sufficient. You do not need specialist software or legal expertise.
Key takeaway: Date, platform, content description, reference number, platform response, and your follow-up — record all six for every interaction.
Preserving evidence properly
Screenshots are your primary evidence. For each piece of content you are concerned about, capture: the content itself; the account that posted it (username, profile URL); the date and time visible in the screenshot; and the platform's in-app context (so it is clear where the content appeared). Name your screenshot files with the date, platform, and a brief description (e.g., '2026-03-14_Instagram_grooming-account'). Where possible, also save URLs — though be aware that URLs may stop working once content is removed.
Key takeaway: Named, dated screenshots with the account visible are your core evidence — name files systematically so you can find them later.
When multiple reports go unanswered
If you have made multiple reports about the same account or content type and received inadequate responses, this pattern is significant. Document the series: how many reports, on what dates, for what content, and what responses were received. Note whether the platform gave different reasons for its decisions on different occasions, or gave no reason at all (which it is required to do under the Act). A series of documented, unanswered reports to the same platform about the same type of content is a strong indicator of systemic failure.
Key takeaway: Multiple unanswered or inadequately explained reports to the same platform about similar content is evidence of systemic failure — document it as a series.
Sharing your documentation with Ofcom and others
When submitting intelligence to Ofcom, attach or describe your documentation: the platform, the dates of complaint, the nature of the content, and the responses received. You do not need to share every screenshot — a clear factual summary with key evidence attached is sufficient. Schools and children's charities may wish to aggregate documentation across multiple cases before submitting to Ofcom, as aggregated evidence of systemic failure carries more weight. Consult your organisation's data protection officer before sharing any documentation that contains personal data about children.
Key takeaway: Aggregate your documentation before submitting to Ofcom where possible — and consult your DPO if you handle data about children.
What the Act does
Requires platforms to explain their decisions when content is or is not removed following a complaint.
Gives Ofcom the power to use intelligence from users and organisations to inform enforcement investigations.
Requires platforms to provide accessible complaints mechanisms — failure to do so is itself a compliance failure.
What the Act does not do
Understanding the limits of the Act helps you set realistic expectations when using complaint and reporting processes.
Guarantee that Ofcom will take action on every piece of submitted intelligence.
Give individual complainants a right to receive a personalised response from Ofcom.
Replace the need to report criminal content — CSAM and serious threats should always be reported to the police, IWF, or CEOP.
Practical steps
Create a simple folder structure: one folder per platform, with sub-folders for each complaint, named by date.
Screenshot everything before you make the initial report — content may be removed during the process.
Record the platform's reference number for every report and complaint.
If a platform fails to explain its decision on a complaint, note this as a potential compliance failure.
Submit your documentation to Ofcom via their online intelligence tool, attaching your most significant evidence.
Frequently asked questions
Do I need to keep documentation in a specific format for Ofcom?
No specific format is required. Ofcom's online tool accepts written descriptions and attachments. A clear, factual summary — covering the platform, the dates, the nature of the content, and the responses received — is more useful than an exhaustive archive. Focus on clarity and completeness of the key facts.
Can schools submit documentation collectively, rather than case by case?
Yes, and this is encouraged. Ofcom values intelligence that demonstrates a pattern of failure across multiple cases and multiple reporters. Schools and local authority safeguarding teams can aggregate their documented cases before submission, provided they handle personal data about children in accordance with data protection law and their own policies.
Sources and further reading
Related guides
Last reviewed: 19 April 2026
This is practical educational content to support families. For case-specific concerns about a child's safety, contact the NSPCC helpline on 0808 800 5000 or your local safeguarding team.
Was this page helpful?